Friday, November 04, 2005

hangman

Singapore known as Asia's hangman

SINGAPORE, Nov 4 AAP - When the Changi Prison executioner loops a noose around the neck of Australian Nguyen Tuong Van, Singapore will be living up to its reputation as the hangman of Asia.

The tightly controlled city-state - governed uninterrupted by the People's Action Party since 1959 - is ranked by human rights group Amnesty International as having the world's highest per capita execution rate.

Between 1991 and 2000, 340 people were hanged in Singapore, according to official figures.

Some years are busier than others. For example, 50 people were hanged in 1996, meaning the gallows were used almost once a week.

Death sentences in Singapore are mostly imposed for drug trafficking, such as in Nguyen's case.

But it's also handed down for murder, kidnapping and some firearms offences.
Tradition dictates that hangings are always set for the early hours of a Friday.
Although criticised abroad, Singapore's tough capital punishment policy is broadly supported at home.

Opinion polls periodically show hanging is backed by around seven out of ten Singaporeans.

But there are a handful of people who disagree.

"Drug addiction cannot be solved by hanging a few people, and these are normally the small-timers ... not the masterminds," said human rights activist Sinapan Samydorai.
Sinapan, a spokesman for the group, Think Centre, is one of a few dozen people set to protest against Nguyen's impending death at a rare vigil planned for Monday.
Melbourne salesman Nguyen, 25, was arrested at Changi Airport in 2002 as he was about to board a flight to Australia.

He was carrying 396 grams of heroin; enough, Singapore authorities say, for 26,000 individual doses.

The final avenue for appeal appeared to have been exhausted.

Foreign Minister Alexander Downer has received a letter from his Singapore counterpart, George Yeo, rejecting any last-minute bid for clemency.

The city-state has a responsibility to prevent Singapore from becoming a conduit for the trafficking of illicit drugs, Yeo's letter to Downer said.

It added that the final decision to take Nguyen's life was debated by cabinet and had not been taken lightly.

Singapore argues that the noose has helped keep it safe from serious crime, especially drug trafficking.

"The Singapore government makes no apology for its tough law and order system," the Ministry of Home Affairs said in a written defence last year of capital punishment.
"The death penalty is a just punishment for those who knowingly and intentionally commit serious crimes, which threaten the lives of others," the document said.

"The death penalty, because of its finality, is more feared than imprisonment as a punishment."

Most of those hanged are Singapore citizens, and the majority are condemned for drug-related crimes.

But official figures also show that the system is more likely to be used against the jobless or low-skilled.

According to the 2004 document, Singapore executed 138 people in the five years to 2003.

Of those 37, or one-quarter, were foreigners.

This figure tallies almost exactly with the proportion of non-Singapore nationals who are resident in the city-state.

Of the same group of 138, one hundred and ten were executed for drug-related offences.

And over the ten years to 2003, fifty one per cent of those hanged were either unemployed or working as unskilled workers, labourers or cleaners.

In the same period, 64 per cent of those hanged were either educated only to primary school level or had no schooling.

Opponents of the death penalty fire back that executions do not make Singapore safer, and violate what they regard as a sacrosanct right to life.

On it website this week, Singapore's Think Centre asked: "If this inhumane practice is really a deterrent, how come we after 40 years of executions still have the highest per capita execution rate in the world with the greatest known proportion of these executions small-time drug mules?"

As Nguyen is a foreigner, the authorities will inform his next of kin and the Australian High Commission of the chosen date between seven and 14 days in advance compared with the four days notice usually allowed for locals.

Nguyen will then be allowed visits from relatives of up to four hours during his final few days.

His execution will be witnessed by a doctor and his body will be handed back to his family.

- Australian Associated Press General News, 4 Nov 2005.

1 comment:

Dave said...

Socially, exaggeration is often whimsical. But when a government dramatically inflates numbers to help justify a death sentence, the integrity of both the trial and its governing body becomes questionable. In this case, the government is Singapore, the trial was for Van Tuong Nguyen, and the bloated number is 26,000.

Press from around the world quotes Abdullah Tarmugi, the Speaker of Singapore Parliament, in writing about the potential consequences of Van's actions, "almost 400 grams of pure heroin, enough for more than 26,000 doses."

But how was 26,000 doses (or "hits") derived?

It turns out that what constitutes a hit of heroin is not an easy thing to count. There are dozens of factors to consider; contact your local Needle Exchange for a comprehensive list. However, after collecting statistics from over a dozen sources (including police reports, narcotics web sites, health information, and workers from needle exchanges), the number of hits from a gram of pure heroin averages out to little more than 14.

Van Tuong Nguyen trafficked 396.2 grams of heroin into Singapore. This is approximately 5,600 doses.

The numbers 5,600 and 26,000 are obviously incongruous, as are reports that 400 grams of heroin would "ruin 26,000 lives". In fact, 400 grams of heroin would not come close to ruining even 5,600 lives. Rather, the heroin would most likely supply people already abusing it. With a little more research, we can estimate how many lives would be adversely affected by 400 grams of heroin during one year:

As many as 67, and as few as 6.

Van Tuong Nguyen would not have sent 26,000 people to their deaths from 400 grams of heroin. Nor would the lives of 26,000 people have been ruined. Far more likely is that six people would get a year's worth of hits. And for this he must hang?

Call it dreadful, call it dense, call it incomprehensible ... but do not call it justice.

Sincerely,
Dave Jarvis